Skip to content
StatisticsRepoStatisticsRepo

Statistics Estonia · NH14

NH14: CANDIDATES AGED 18–26 IN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ELECTIONS AND COUNCIL MEMBERS by Administrative unit, Year and Indicator

Official source
https://andmed.stat.ee/en/stat/NH14
Source provider
stat
Retrieved
2026-09-24T04:12:38.200Z
License / reuse
Statistics Estonia open data. Cite Statistics Estonia (Statistikaamet) as the source.
Coverage
Frequency
Stored observations
1,140 (precomputed, dataset-scoped)
Finality
Cell-level preliminary/final flags are shown only when the source publishes them. Period titles are shown as published.

Dimensions

  • Administrative unit · dimension · 95 values
  • Year · time · 2 values
  • Indicator · dimension · 6 values
  • Measure · measure · 1 values

Bounded explorer

Each number is shown with its stored dimensions, period, measure, and unit. Queries are limited to 100 table rows. The full observation cube is not loaded in the browser. Suppressed or empty cells are not stored and are not converted to 0.

Selected filters: Measure: Value Reset explorer

Reset explorer

A valid chart cannot be drawn from this selection without mixing incomparable dimensions.

Selected slice: · ·
PeriodAdministrative unitIndicatorMeasureValueUnit
2017Whole countryNumber of candidates aged 18–26Value771
2017Whole countryShare of persons aged 18–26 among candidates, %Value6.5
2017Whole countryNumber of seats in the municipal councilValue1729
2017Whole countryNumber of council members aged 18–26Value37
2017Whole countryShare of council members aged 18–26 in the municipal council, %Value2.1
2017HARJU COUNTYNumber of candidates totalValue3176
2017HARJU COUNTYNumber of candidates aged 18–26Value235
2017HARJU COUNTYShare of persons aged 18–26 among candidates, %Value7.4
2017HARJU COUNTYNumber of seats in the municipal councilValue376
2017HARJU COUNTYNumber of council members aged 18–26Value6
2017HARJU COUNTYShare of council members aged 18–26 in the municipal council, %Value1.6
2017..Anija rural municipalityNumber of candidates totalValue73
2017..Anija rural municipalityNumber of candidates aged 18–26Value2
2017..Anija rural municipalityShare of persons aged 18–26 among candidates, %Value2.7
2017..Anija rural municipalityNumber of seats in the municipal councilValue19
2017..Anija rural municipalityNumber of council members aged 18–26Value0
2017..Anija rural municipalityShare of council members aged 18–26 in the municipal council, %Value0
2017..Harku rural municipalityNumber of candidates totalValue128
2017..Harku rural municipalityNumber of candidates aged 18–26Value10
2017..Harku rural municipalityShare of persons aged 18–26 among candidates, %Value7.8
2017..Harku rural municipalityNumber of seats in the municipal councilValue21
2017..Harku rural municipalityNumber of council members aged 18–26Value0
2017..Harku rural municipalityShare of council members aged 18–26 in the municipal council, %Value0
2017..Jõelähtme rural municipalityNumber of candidates totalValue83
2017..Jõelähtme rural municipalityNumber of candidates aged 18–26Value3
2017..Jõelähtme rural municipalityShare of persons aged 18–26 among candidates, %Value3.6
2017..Jõelähtme rural municipalityNumber of seats in the municipal councilValue17
2017..Jõelähtme rural municipalityNumber of council members aged 18–26Value0
2017..Jõelähtme rural municipalityShare of council members aged 18–26 in the municipal council, %Value0
2017..Keila cityNumber of candidates totalValue95
2017..Keila cityNumber of candidates aged 18–26Value11
2017..Keila cityShare of persons aged 18–26 among candidates, %Value11.6
2017..Keila cityNumber of seats in the municipal councilValue19
2017..Keila cityNumber of council members aged 18–26Value0
2017..Keila cityShare of council members aged 18–26 in the municipal council, %Value0
2017..Kiili rural municipalityNumber of candidates totalValue51
2017..Kiili rural municipalityNumber of candidates aged 18–26Value2
2017..Kiili rural municipalityShare of persons aged 18–26 among candidates, %Value3.9
2017..Kiili rural municipalityNumber of seats in the municipal councilValue17
2017..Kiili rural municipalityNumber of council members aged 18–26Value1
2017..Kiili rural municipalityShare of council members aged 18–26 in the municipal council, %Value5.9
2017..Kose rural municipalityNumber of candidates totalValue137
2017..Kose rural municipalityNumber of candidates aged 18–26Value12
2017..Kose rural municipalityShare of persons aged 18–26 among candidates, %Value8.8
2017..Kose rural municipalityNumber of seats in the municipal councilValue19
2017..Kose rural municipalityNumber of council members aged 18–26Value1
2017..Kose rural municipalityShare of council members aged 18–26 in the municipal council, %Value5.3
2017..Kuusalu rural municipalityNumber of candidates totalValue157
2017..Kuusalu rural municipalityNumber of candidates aged 18–26Value8
2017..Kuusalu rural municipalityShare of persons aged 18–26 among candidates, %Value5.1
2017..Kuusalu rural municipalityNumber of seats in the municipal councilValue19
2017..Kuusalu rural municipalityNumber of council members aged 18–26Value0
2017..Kuusalu rural municipalityShare of council members aged 18–26 in the municipal council, %Value0
2017..Loksa cityNumber of candidates totalValue46
2017..Loksa cityNumber of candidates aged 18–26Value0
2017..Loksa cityShare of persons aged 18–26 among candidates, %Value0
2017..Loksa cityNumber of seats in the municipal councilValue15
2017..Loksa cityNumber of council members aged 18–26Value0
2017..Loksa cityShare of council members aged 18–26 in the municipal council, %Value0
2017..Lääne-Harju rural municipalityNumber of candidates totalValue178
2017..Lääne-Harju rural municipalityNumber of candidates aged 18–26Value9
2017..Lääne-Harju rural municipalityShare of persons aged 18–26 among candidates, %Value5.1
2017..Lääne-Harju rural municipalityNumber of seats in the municipal councilValue21
2017..Lääne-Harju rural municipalityNumber of council members aged 18–26Value0
2017..Lääne-Harju rural municipalityShare of council members aged 18–26 in the municipal council, %Value0
2017..Maardu cityNumber of candidates totalValue141
2017..Maardu cityNumber of candidates aged 18–26Value11
2017..Maardu cityShare of persons aged 18–26 among candidates, %Value7.8
2017..Maardu cityNumber of seats in the municipal councilValue21
2017..Maardu cityNumber of council members aged 18–26Value1
2017..Maardu cityShare of council members aged 18–26 in the municipal council, %Value4.8
2017..Raasiku rural municipalityNumber of candidates totalValue66
2017..Raasiku rural municipalityNumber of candidates aged 18–26Value7
2017..Raasiku rural municipalityShare of persons aged 18–26 among candidates, %Value10.6
2017..Raasiku rural municipalityNumber of seats in the municipal councilValue17
2017..Raasiku rural municipalityNumber of council members aged 18–26Value1
2017..Raasiku rural municipalityShare of council members aged 18–26 in the municipal council, %Value5.9
2017..Rae rural municipalityNumber of candidates totalValue121
2017..Rae rural municipalityNumber of candidates aged 18–26Value7
2017..Rae rural municipalityShare of persons aged 18–26 among candidates, %Value5.8
2017..Rae rural municipalityNumber of seats in the municipal councilValue25
2017..Rae rural municipalityNumber of council members aged 18–26Value0
2017..Rae rural municipalityShare of council members aged 18–26 in the municipal council, %Value0
2017..Saku rural municipalityNumber of candidates totalValue111
2017..Saku rural municipalityNumber of candidates aged 18–26Value16
2017..Saku rural municipalityShare of persons aged 18–26 among candidates, %Value14.4
2017..Saku rural municipalityNumber of seats in the municipal councilValue19
2017..Saku rural municipalityNumber of council members aged 18–26Value0
2017..Saku rural municipalityShare of council members aged 18–26 in the municipal council, %Value0
2017..Saue rural municipalityNumber of candidates totalValue191
2017..Saue rural municipalityNumber of candidates aged 18–26Value11
2017..Saue rural municipalityShare of persons aged 18–26 among candidates, %Value5.8
2017..Saue rural municipalityNumber of seats in the municipal councilValue27
2017..Saue rural municipalityNumber of council members aged 18–26Value1
2017..Saue rural municipalityShare of council members aged 18–26 in the municipal council, %Value3.7
2017..TallinnNumber of candidates totalValue1414
2017..TallinnNumber of candidates aged 18–26Value117
2017..TallinnShare of persons aged 18–26 among candidates, %Value8.3
2017..TallinnNumber of seats in the municipal councilValue79
2017Whole countryNumber of candidates totalValue11804

Showing 100 rows (cap 100). Source: Statistics Estonia NH14. Stored 0 is a published source zero. Unavailable source cells are absent.