Statistics Estonia · KO12
KO12: RESPONDENTS by Year, Indicator, Satisfaction with living environment / services and Assessment
- Official source
- https://andmed.stat.ee/en/stat/KO12
- Source provider
- stat
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24T03:53:52.073Z
- License / reuse
- Statistics Estonia open data. Cite Statistics Estonia (Statistikaamet) as the source.
- Coverage
- —
- Frequency
- —
- Stored observations
- 117 (precomputed, dataset-scoped)
- Finality
- Cell-level preliminary/final flags are shown only when the source publishes them. Period titles are shown as published.
Dimensions
- Year · time · 1 values
- Indicator · dimension · 2 values
- Satisfaction with living environment / services · dimension · 13 values
- Assessment · dimension · 5 values
- Measure · measure · 1 values
Bounded explorer
Each number is shown with its stored dimensions, period, measure, and unit. Queries are limited to 100 table rows. The full observation cube is not loaded in the browser. Suppressed or empty cells are not stored and are not converted to 0.
Selected filters: Measure: Value Reset explorer
A valid chart cannot be drawn from this selection without mixing incomparable dimensions.
| Period | Indicator | Satisfaction with living environment / services | Assessment | Measure | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction in general with your living environment | Very satisfied | Value | 13.8 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction in general with your living environment | Rather satisfied | Value | 68.4 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction in general with your living environment | Not very satisfied | Value | 12.3 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction in general with your living environment | Not at all satisfied | Value | 2.7 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction in general with your living environment | Cannot say | Value | 2.8 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with cultural leisure facilities | Very satisfied | Value | 13.5 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with cultural leisure facilities | Rather satisfied | Value | 49.3 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with cultural leisure facilities | Not very satisfied | Value | 17.1 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with cultural leisure facilities | Not at all satisfied | Value | 7.9 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with cultural leisure facilities | Cannot say | Value | 12.2 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with exercise and sports facilities | Very satisfied | Value | 22.2 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with exercise and sports facilities | Rather satisfied | Value | 50.6 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with exercise and sports facilities | Not very satisfied | Value | 13.3 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with exercise and sports facilities | Not at all satisfied | Value | 5.8 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with exercise and sports facilities | Cannot say | Value | 8.1 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with public transport service | Very satisfied | Value | 15.4 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with public transport service | Rather satisfied | Value | 41.1 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with public transport service | Not very satisfied | Value | 17.6 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with public transport service | Not at all satisfied | Value | 11.1 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with public transport service | Cannot say | Value | 14.8 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with possibilities of walking and cycling | Very satisfied | Value | 30 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with possibilities of walking and cycling | Rather satisfied | Value | 46.4 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with possibilities of walking and cycling | Not very satisfied | Value | 12 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with possibilities of walking and cycling | Not at all satisfied | Value | 7.7 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with possibilities of walking and cycling | Cannot say | Value | 3.8 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with the sufficiency and accessibility of green areas | Very satisfied | Value | 30.7 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with the sufficiency and accessibility of green areas | Rather satisfied | Value | 48.8 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with the sufficiency and accessibility of green areas | Not very satisfied | Value | 10.7 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with the sufficiency and accessibility of green areas | Not at all satisfied | Value | 3.8 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with the sufficiency and accessibility of green areas | Cannot say | Value | 6 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with architecture and surroundings | Very satisfied | Value | 12.7 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with architecture and surroundings | Rather satisfied | Value | 51.7 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with architecture and surroundings | Not very satisfied | Value | 18.4 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with architecture and surroundings | Not at all satisfied | Value | 6.1 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with architecture and surroundings | Cannot say | Value | 11.2 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with public spaces (squares, markets, pedestrian areas, parkes) | Very satisfied | Value | 13.6 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with public spaces (squares, markets, pedestrian areas, parkes) | Rather satisfied | Value | 52 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with public spaces (squares, markets, pedestrian areas, parkes) | Not very satisfied | Value | 18.1 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with public spaces (squares, markets, pedestrian areas, parkes) | Not at all satisfied | Value | 6.6 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with public spaces (squares, markets, pedestrian areas, parkes) | Cannot say | Value | 9.7 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with roadways and streets | Very satisfied | Value | 8.1 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with roadways and streets | Rather satisfied | Value | 48.4 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with roadways and streets | Not very satisfied | Value | 26.9 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with roadways and streets | Not at all satisfied | Value | 14.1 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with roadways and streets | Cannot say | Value | 2.4 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with outdoor air quality (odor nuisance, air pollution) | Very satisfied | Value | 27.9 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with outdoor air quality (odor nuisance, air pollution) | Rather satisfied | Value | 51.9 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with outdoor air quality (odor nuisance, air pollution) | Not very satisfied | Value | 11.8 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with outdoor air quality (odor nuisance, air pollution) | Not at all satisfied | Value | 5.2 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with outdoor air quality (odor nuisance, air pollution) | Cannot say | Value | 3.2 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with noise level | Very satisfied | Value | 24.8 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with noise level | Rather satisfied | Value | 55.8 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with noise level | Not very satisfied | Value | 12.2 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with noise level | Not at all satisfied | Value | 4.6 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with noise level | Cannot say | Value | 2.6 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with waste transport | Very satisfied | Value | 24.3 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with waste transport | Rather satisfied | Value | 58.7 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with waste transport | Not very satisfied | Value | 10.1 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with waste transport | Not at all satisfied | Value | 3.5 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with waste transport | Cannot say | Value | 3.3 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with the possibilities of sorting waste by species | Very satisfied | Value | 13.8 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with the possibilities of sorting waste by species | Rather satisfied | Value | 47.1 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with the possibilities of sorting waste by species | Not very satisfied | Value | 20.6 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with the possibilities of sorting waste by species | Not at all satisfied | Value | 9.6 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total satisfaction = 100), % | Satisfaction with the possibilities of sorting waste by species | Cannot say | Value | 8.8 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction in general with your living environment | Very satisfied | Value | 14.2 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction in general with your living environment | Rather satisfied | Value | 70.3 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction in general with your living environment | Not very satisfied | Value | 12.6 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction in general with your living environment | Not at all satisfied | Value | 2.8 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with cultural leisure facilities | Very satisfied | Value | 15.4 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with cultural leisure facilities | Rather satisfied | Value | 56.1 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with cultural leisure facilities | Not very satisfied | Value | 19.5 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with cultural leisure facilities | Not at all satisfied | Value | 9 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with exercise and sports facilities | Very satisfied | Value | 24.2 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with exercise and sports facilities | Rather satisfied | Value | 55.1 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with exercise and sports facilities | Not very satisfied | Value | 14.5 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with exercise and sports facilities | Not at all satisfied | Value | 6.3 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with public transport service | Very satisfied | Value | 18.1 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with public transport service | Rather satisfied | Value | 48.3 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with public transport service | Not very satisfied | Value | 20.7 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with public transport service | Not at all satisfied | Value | 13 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with possibilities of walking and cycling | Very satisfied | Value | 31.2 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with possibilities of walking and cycling | Rather satisfied | Value | 48.3 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with possibilities of walking and cycling | Not very satisfied | Value | 12.5 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with possibilities of walking and cycling | Not at all satisfied | Value | 8 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with the sufficiency and accessibility of green areas | Very satisfied | Value | 32.7 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with the sufficiency and accessibility of green areas | Rather satisfied | Value | 52 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with the sufficiency and accessibility of green areas | Not very satisfied | Value | 11.3 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with the sufficiency and accessibility of green areas | Not at all satisfied | Value | 4 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with architecture and surroundings | Very satisfied | Value | 14.3 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with architecture and surroundings | Rather satisfied | Value | 58.1 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with architecture and surroundings | Not very satisfied | Value | 20.7 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with architecture and surroundings | Not at all satisfied | Value | 6.9 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with public spaces (squares, markets, pedestrian areas, parkes) | Very satisfied | Value | 15.1 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with public spaces (squares, markets, pedestrian areas, parkes) | Rather satisfied | Value | 57.5 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with public spaces (squares, markets, pedestrian areas, parkes) | Not very satisfied | Value | 20.1 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with public spaces (squares, markets, pedestrian areas, parkes) | Not at all satisfied | Value | 7.3 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with roadways and streets | Very satisfied | Value | 8.3 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with roadways and streets | Rather satisfied | Value | 49.6 | — |
| 2020 | Share of respondents (total assessment, excl. ''Cannot say'' = 100), % | Satisfaction with roadways and streets | Not very satisfied | Value | 27.6 | — |
Showing 100 rows (cap 100). Source: Statistics Estonia KO12. Stored 0 is a published source zero. Unavailable source cells are absent.